December 18, 2007

5 Key Talent Acquisition Themes Heard in 2007

Jobs2Web enjoyed terrific adoption this year, and along the way I had the opportunity to speak with hundreds of organizations regarding their talent acquisition direction - here are five themes I heard repeatedly:

  1. Measure your talent acquisition by source - know your applicant/interview/offer/hire numbers by source, and then check back in six and twelve months to determine retention by source.
  2. Don't rely on the applicant to select the correct source -- have your partners auto-tag the source of the candidate when they deliver them to your ATS. This will probably improve your source accuracy by 200-300%.
  3. Leverage your cost-per-hire - when you can auto-track by source you can determine your ROI. Be sure to leverage those numbers when you're renegotiating especially your job-board contracts. Which leads to observation 4...
  4. Start reducing your job-board spend - I know of several F500 firms have dropped at least one of the big three job boards in the past quarter. Reasons given: increasing subscription prices, rising cost-per-hire, wide applicant: offer rate (e.g. too many candidates to weed through...), and the internal need to source passive or semi-passive candidates vs. only active candidates.
  5. Begin tapping the passives and semi-passives using Google, Yahoo, and the other major search engines. The 35 million job-related searches monthly on search engines are done primarily by non-active job-seekers -- just individuals looking around for new career opportunities, but not desperately seeking a new gig (a/k/a a job-board applicant...). If your jobs and job families optimized and visible, you can access this candidate traffic.

2008 will see many more organizations adopt both pay-per-click and organic search engine marketing solutions to offset the falling productivity of job-boards. Those that can measure their applicant flow by source will be able to invest wisely.

Peter Brasket is a co-founder of HotGigs, and leads the Jobs2Web program

November 15, 2007

Why your jobs need to be Google ready...

...And why they probably aren't. Authoria has the lowdown in their online newsletter, Recruiting Edge, which features an article on search engine visibility by our own Peter Brasket:

Organizations typically place a lot of emphasis on recruiter performance, instead focusing on such metrics as “placements made” and “time-to-fill.” But the performance of the company’s career website and its impact on these metrics is largely overlooked if not ignored.

So there’s no question that your recruiters should be working hard, but are your jobs contributing to your overall recruiting performance?

Let’s start with a basic metric: Over 30 million job-oriented searches are run monthly on Google, Yahoo, MSN, and other major search engines. Not surprisingly, these search engines get 25-30X more traffic (i.e., potential candidates) than the mainstream job boards.

Unfortunately, chances are your jobs didn’t show up in these searches.

Read the rest in this month's Recruiting Edge. Then head over to our newly-redesigned website (www.jobs2web.com) to see some examples of how major companies like the Mayo Clinic, AT&T Wireless and Xerox are making sure their jobs do show up where it counts. You can also find case studies and video presentations on how employers are increasing candidate flow by optimizing their career sites for Web searches.

As Peter's article underscores, one of the roadblocks to getting your jobs to show up on Google, Yahoo, MSN and the rest is that most Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) are designed to prevent that very thing. To remedy that, use an ATS that integrates seamlessly with Jobs2Web, such as Authoria Recruiting.

August 08, 2007

How to supercharge your career site (in less than 30 minutes)

Doug Berg presents on career site optimization technologies and techniques at the July Recruiting.com Roadshow in Minneapolis Important disclaimer: 30 minutes actually refers the length of this online PowerPoint/video presentation from the last month's Recruiting.com Roadshow and Un-Conference, which was held at Best Buy headquarters in the Twin Cities. Doug Berg, co-founder of Jobs2Web and HotGigs, gave a whirlwind tour of how updating your career site and making it search engine friendly can pay huge dividends in increased candidate flow.

Nicole St. Martin, our resident search optimization expert at Jobs2Web, sets the stage for Doug who leads us on a thought-provoking tour, touching on topics such as:

  • How typical corporate job/career sites actually drive away candidates
  • Why your ATS is a great tool once you know the candidate, but works against you on the Web
  • Why your jobs are probably not being found on Google, Yahoo and MSN, and what you can do about it
  • How to effectively use email marketing to promote your employment brand
  • How to reach out to passive candidates via webinars and online recruiting events
  • Why every career site needs a Live Chat to engage visitors in real time
  • What is an RSS feed and how you can use it to form and maintain relationships with top candidates

If you are in HR or otherwise responsible for helping your organization win the war for talent, you owe it to yourself to grab a cup of coffee and view this online presentation, which combines slides and video. You can find it here.

Afterwards, if you have questions you can either leave a comment below, drop us an email at customerservice@jobs2web.com, or contact us directly via phone or Live Chat.

August 06, 2007

Xerox/Jobs2Web case study:The Chad digs deeper

Chad Sowash follows up on our recently-released case study on Xerox's SEO efforts with Jobs2Web. He has a conversation with a knowledgeable Xerox insider, "a friend of mine who we’ll just call Dave" on tbe benefits of career site optimization via Jobs2Web:

Chad: How were they able to implement SEO changes without getting your ATS provider involved?

Dave: The Jobs2Web team created a optimized site which they maintain, optimize with Xerox job content, and provide the correct links back to our ATS for proper job seeker application and tracking. Also remember, all new sites have to gain favor with the search engines and become “trusted”, which took some time with the new optimized site, but the results are really showing now.

Chad: Big question, what differences are you seeing when using SEO versus traditional job boards?

Dave: SEO has provided more relevant candidates, where we have noted job boards providing more irrelevant candidates, which equates into more work and lower efficiencies for our recruiting staff. We have adopted SEO to reduce reliance on job boards, provide more relevant candidates, and improve efficiencies. Through our research, here at Xerox, we were finding job postings on job boards just wasn’t bringing in the right candidates, which wasted our recruiters time and pushed us further toward the relevance model of SEO.

Read the entire interview at Chad's blog.

July 23, 2007

Jobs2Web Career Website Optimization Case Study – Xerox

I frequently am asked how long does it take for Jobs2Web to really drive a search-engine impact. I begin by defining “impact” as search-engine visibility, candidate flow, and hires.

To illustrate, Xerox agreed to share their “impact” success story, with the exception of hiring data, which we’ll keep confidential.

We launched Xerox’s Jobs2Web program in October 2006.  At the time they had no job-presence within organic search results on Google or Yahoo, and realized they were missing an important and growing flow of candidates (indeed – today there are over 30,000,000 job-related searches on the major search engines monthly).

Jobs2Web Impact

Our impact data through the initial eight-months looked like this:

The applies are driven from the job aggregation boards to which we post the optimized jobs, as well as from the major search engines. As indexing and ranking strengthen for our clients, search-engine based job-seekers increase.

By mid-June we had built Xerox’s Google rankings by job category into highly visible range.  With Jobs2Web keeping Xerox’s jobs up to date on a daily basis, those clicking on the links were rewarded with highly-relevant, matching job content.  Here are the first twenty job categories optimized for Xerox – you can see the entire list at Xerox-jobs.com 

To see a result, just type the Jobs2Web Category name into Google and search; Xerox-jobs.com is the Jobs2Web result.

Impressive after just eight months.  Check out the Software Engineer Jobs listing for example – Xerox was the 52nd listing (excluding sub-domains) out of 135 million possible results.  Typically Xerox is the only direct employer visible within the search results, a strong proxy as a savvy employer.

The Power of Search

To illustrate the strengthening benefit of search-engine optimization for jobs, let’s look at the Xerox data in the subsequent 40 days:

In about a month an a half Jobs2Web had generated over 600 applicants on almost 7000 visitors – 40% of what had taken the previous eight months.  The continued improvement in results can be largely attributable to the search engine optimization efforts (SEO).  Here are the same Google rankings for the terms noted earlier, just one month later:

Several key job categories that were not in the top 100 listings in June were so in July; others showed good progress, and those highly-ranked remained highly-ranked.

Jobs2Web can drive candidate flow on day one from the major search engines, but to enjoy the candidate flow and employer-of-choice branding driven by high organic search rankings, recruiting managers should use Xerox as an example, and set a two- to three-quarter expectation internally.

Peter Brasket is a co-founder of HotGigs, and leads the Jobs2Web career site and search engine optimization project.

July 13, 2007

Are your job titles hurting your recruiting?

The answer: definitely. To find out how, read "Wouldn't you love a job as a P2 Fld Comp Sup?" by our own Doug Berg, currently on the front page at ERE.net.

June 26, 2007

How long will it take for our jobs to show up in Google?

This is a question our Jobs2Web team is asked daily by employers, and one I’d like to tackle in this post.

I think the best way to answer is to share some Google results for clients, so I’ve added some links to results at the end of this blog entry. But let me provide a bit of background on what has to happen to get your jobs to show up in the major search engines.

80-85% of the clicks on a search result page will be on “organic” or “natural” search result links (e.g. – not paid ads). There are two basic pre-conditions to show up in the natural results: Indexing and Ranking.

Indexing means your jobs must be found by the Search Engines. If you’re using an applicant tracking system (ATS) today, your jobs are most likely not indexable. The ATS prevents the Search Engine spiders from finding your job content.

Secondly your jobs and job families or categories need to be relevant to the search; the more relevant and mindful of Search Engine rules, the higher ranked within the results. Unfortunately jobs played by an ATS are not rank-friendly.

So the double-whammy for most employers is your jobs can’t be found by the Search Engines, and even if found would not be highly ranked.

When we solve these issues with Jobs2Web we find early Search Engine traffic results when a searcher includes the name of the employer in the search string. That is unusual however – our research finds only about .1% of job-related searches will include the name of the desired employer.

The predominant search combines the location, the job name, and the word “job”. For example “Minnesota Hospital Administration Jobs”, or “08889 SAP OTC job” for a zip code-based search.

Indexing and ranking will differ by client. After eight months of Jobs2Web optimization Xerox has become very strong in a number of job family categories important to their hiring requirements, and in many of their results is the only employer visible (job-boards dominate).

Cingular (now AT&T) had no direct jobs presence on Google three quarters ago – but is now the fourth result for “retail sales jobs”, critical as they have over 1500 open sales positions in their Jobs2Web program.

Strong results can occur faster – HealthEast was the first healthcare provider to adopt Jobs2Web in Minnesota, and now dominates relevant job searches. 36 of their forty optimized job families/categories now appear in the first forty Google results. It’s been about five months since their Jobs2Web program went live. Results here.

So what is the right expectation to set for your jobs to be visible within organic Search Engines? You should see results within 2-3 quarters, and when done properly the results will continue to strengthen with time.

Peter Brasket is a co-founder of HotGigs, and leads the Jobs2Web career site and search engine optimization project.

June 25, 2007

Do you re-recruit past applicants?

I continue to be amazed when speaking with hiring companies how few of them will search their current applicant tracking systems for previous candidates when starting a new job search.

In some cases, companies have literally tens of thousands of previous applicants in their ATS that they have spent thousands of advertising dollars to acquire, but they don’t re-access them for future searches. When I ask most recruiters "Do you search your current ATS when starting a new search?”"they mostly respond with "No…"

The common process when new jobs come into the recruiting group is to get them out to the job boards – and spend more money – or burn up your job posting allocations to try and drive new candidates to apply, and only process applicants as they come in.

Here are some of the reasons that companies we’ve spoken with don’t pursue previous applicants.

1. Most ATS systems have horrible candidate searching abilities.

a) The keyword searching abilities don’t support even the most basic abilities – so finding candidate in the last year with a certain skill and/or education level isn’t possible – so they just give up.

2. The assumption that previous applicants were bad.

a) Most recruiters think that any previous applicants must all have been turned down for positions, and are therefore are bad candidates. This couldn’t be farther from the truth. 80% or more candidates aren’t considered for certain positions because they didn’t match the specific job, which could mean they didn’t have the specific skills, or were over/under qualified for that specific job only.

b) Also, many great candidates are on and off the market so quickly that most larger companies just couldn’t get them through their hiring cycle fast enough – and lose out on hiring great candidates. This shouldn’t mean that you stop marketing to those great candidates however! Candidates situations can change rapidly within just months of taking new positions at different companies, and a tap on the shoulder down the road would impress the daylights of a top candidate should companies get more strategic in communicating with these candidates.

3. Searching, matching, and communicating with candidates is hard work.

a) Even if a recruiter was able to search and find a list of possible candidates, going through the process of building a list of candidates for a job, building an email introduction/catch up message, and sending it out to candidates can take a lot of time, which most recruiters just don’t have. That’s why they just post new positions, and assume that the job boards will have all the currently active candidates in the
market apply for their jobs - but unfortunately those active candidates are applying to everyone else’s jobs at the same time.

b) Most ATS systems don’t have the ability to build group lists of certain candidate types – so building ongoing marketing lists within the ATS system to quickly broadcast a certain type of job or position is very difficult.

c) In some cases – candidates won’t want any future calls or communication from a hiring company – but ATS systems make it hard to flag candidates (or enter notes) regarding avoiding future communication.

4. Companies are afraid to look desperate if reaching out to candidates.

a) Most companies think that re-recruiting candidates for certain jobs might make them look desperate (which most of them are…but like to hide it) which would turn off candidates.

This couldn’t be farther from the truth. Most candidates are impressed with companies that actually remember them, and inform them frequently about opportunities at their company. The best companies not only communicate job information, but updates on their employment culture via newsletters and important updates within the company – which could be easily communicated to their candidate community.

How can you change this?

While we hope to have convinced you to start logging back into your own ATS to start re-sourcing candidates, there is an easier and more strategic way to communicate with previous applicants on an ongoing basis. This can help you leverage your investment in that candidate pool you’ve created, and help you recapture their attention for future positions – or leverage them for referrals to their network of friends who can view your positions, and refer them to join your candidate community online.

At Jobs2Web, our job marketing technology not only gathers new subscribers to your companies career site – but we can also import your previous applicants into your candidate marketing database, and segment them by job category and locations so that they are notified automatically of new positions as they come up.

Your website will become your best “virtual recruiter”.

With each new position that is posted on your companies career site, we will automatically match and email the positions to your candidate database – inviting them to re-apply for positions within your ATS, or tell their friends about the positions, which will drive more candidates to your career site, and help you build a strategic job marketing engine, and helping you do more direct hires versus paying money every time a new job posting comes up.

The startup phase of this type of effort isn’t as hard as most people think, as we work with your ATS expert (internally or externally) to pull your database, and determine what categories and locations candidates are allocated to for the initial setup phase. This can be based on their current resumes, or previous jobs they’ve applied to.

Once they are setup in the system, they will begin receiving email notifications of your job postings (branded to your company) along with an explanation of why they are getting the job notifications (because they have previously applied to your company) and are given the easy ability to update the categories and locations of interest – so that they can self update the categories/locations of interest, or unsubscribe from your list which prevents any future problems with spamming the candidates etc.

Avoid spamming and keeping your database clean.

The Jobs2Web solution also handles all email bounces (hard and soft) and/or reply emails so that you don’t have to deal with cleaning the email database (which can get overwhelming) – and also gives your
job marketing efforts the best practices for email marketing.

Companies also have real-time access to their candidate marketing database within jobs2web and can add, edit, or delete certain candidates from their system. This means that you can “de-list” undesirable candidates from receiving future email notifications.

How re-recruiting can recapture previous candidates.

The irony is, I think most candidates assume if they’ve applied one time to any company, that they are “on file” with that company, and should there be future interest in them – then the company will call (even though we know that companies aren’t using their ATS in this way.)

This will certainly prevent them from applying for future positions – and to assume they will remember your company months or years from now – and revisit your career site to search for jobs and re-apply isn’t a good assumption.

However, should a previous candidate get an email from your company with a matching job 10 months after they applied – inviting them to re-apply for a new position, and things aren’t going well with the company they decided to take their current job with instead of yours, bingo – you are now on top of your re-recruiting game, and leveraging your past applicants to become future candidates and employees with your company.

Cheers--

Doug

May 01, 2007

LiveChat for Recruiters – Three Models

It is fun working with employers furiously engaged in the battle for talent – especially those with a “try and learn” mentality.  They have a keen sense for risk & reward – which means they understand their problems, have clear objectives, and can measure their applied effort and results.

Let’s start with a common problem – getting traffic that visits a career site to actually register or apply.  Dr. John Sullivan’s organization found that 92% of first-time visitors to a career site don’t apply.  You spent all that money to get them there, and they vanish without a trace.

So let’s say the objective is to double that conversion rate.  There are a number of elements an employer can apply, several of which I’ve blogged about previously.  Perhaps one of the easiest is adding Live Chat to your career site.

Live Chat is currently deployed by thousands of organizations as a sales, marketing, and customer service tool.  It’s become ubiquitous within our daily lives, as we IM constantly.  It’s a proven, stable, cheap technology.  Yet Live Chat isn’t used extensively within the recruitment field….in fact when I visit major vendors of live chat functionality, I rarely if ever see employment application examples.

OK – so recruiting organizations are a little slow to adopt technology.  That said, here are three examples of employers that have deployed live chat – and each deployment is a unique approach.

1) ATS Help Live Chat – this is a service offering from ATS vendor HR Services, and is designed to assist applicants with any questions regarding the HR Services ATS.  Client HCR Manor Care deploys it after a candidate has entered the apply process, so the application is really designed to improve the conversion rate of applicants that begin the apply process.

Chat_image1_4   

2) Hiring Q&A Chat – Schedule-based:  This version of Live Chat is really menu-driven, and is probably not available when you need it.  A good example of this approach is Lockheed Martin, which offers a complete menu and schedule of chat topics – you can for example speak with a recruiter about nursing jobs in DC, but only once a week from 4-6 EDT….

Chat_image2_2

I’m not ready to negatively judge this approach, especially given the breadth of open reqs, hiring locations, and divisions at Lockheed Martin.  So this approach will help with the objective, but lacks the ‘me –now’ mentality of IMers.

3) Hiring Q&A Chat – Live: This is what many job-seekers would expect when they click on a “Live Chat” – immediate answers to their questions, and Rackspace is an excellent example:

Chat_image3 

Because ‘try & learn’ leaders set objectives and measure results I wasn’t surprised when the Director of Recruiting at Rackspace was able to provide the insight:

a) how many chat sessions are generated per day?   probably 20 – 30 a day
b) what is the visit or visitor: chat ratio?  50:1
c) how many recruiters handle chat?  One presently
d) how many concurrent chats can one recruiter handle:  About 3 max. It goes up to 4; response time is slower when it is more than a couple.
e) anything anecdotal to share about the value of live chat on a recruiting site?  I get a lot of compliments on chat and the website.  People seem to feel like they are getting a chance to talk to someone from Rackspace.  I think it helps them with understanding our hiring process.   

I can echo that past comment, having deployed Live Chat on not just career sites, but on a large job-board with hundred of thousands of visits monthly.  The instant response permits a personal, human touch, and instantly builds credibility.

Your expense?  Live Chat monthly is cheap – so why not pilot it on your career site and see what it does to your candidate capture rate next month?

_______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Peter Brasket is a co-founder of HotGigs, and leads the Jobs2Web career site and search engine optimization project.

March 29, 2007

The Future Job Posting Page

Brasket I spent last week in Texas, giving a seminar on trends in recruiting technology, and one slide in particular generated a lot of excitement: What the job page will look like in the future.

Today, a job page typically contains a single call to action: Apply. That's great if the candidate's really ready to apply, but if they're not--too busy, not quite ready to make the jump, need more information, the boss is coming down the hall--there's nothing else for them to do.

I think that's why the View Job to Apply ratio is typically in the low single digits. But the talent wars are escalating, folks, and that's no longer enough. We've got to figure out how to change today's "look&book" to "look&hook." How do we grab that visitor's identity, get him into our network, in that very brief moment that he views the job listing?

The good news is that most of technologies that help solve this problem are already available commercially and they're relatively inexpensive. The bad news is that not enough people are using them. I've built a little diagram of a Jobs2Web career site that includes them..and incidentally is a pretty good example of what the job page of the future should look like (below). Let's look at each of the callouts in the gold boxes.
Capturing_talent_5
Add to personal home page. In two clicks, this button permits the visitor to insert a list of future, similar jobs into his Google, MSN or Yahoo personal home page. This is big for recruiters; as of January 2007 there were SEVENTY MILLION personal home pages. How would you like to capture that audience?

Subscribe to similar jobs. You've seen this for a long time; it's the classic e-mail opt-in. The modern version is clean and simple: the visitor types in an e-mail address and only similar jobs in matching locations are sent. At most, they can choose job and location filters. If only a few opt in every day that gives smaller, regional clients hundreds or thousands of deferred candidates to contact for future positions. ConstantContact, for example, offers this for only about $30/month.

Add RSS feed. Today's browsers support built-in RSS feeds and RSS readers are popular additions. Using this, similar jobs automatically reach deferred candidates. HotGigs has embedded this feature into Jobs2Web client sites; to do this on your own career site you'll need to embed a script. No programming needed and it's proven.

Feature webinar. This is a call to action to help visitors learn more about the company's work environment. The visitor clicks the box, provides information and is sent an invitation. You've just captured their identity. The webinars are easy and inexpensive to develop with products like GotoMeeting ($50/month) or GotoWebinar ($99/month). Most popular webinars have department or hiring managers talking about issues germane to the work, challenges, opportunities, i.e., anything likely to persuade a prospective candidate to submit that application.

Live recruiter chat. OK, this one generated a lot of skeptical looks when I brought it up. It seems like a heavy IT project (it isn't) and it seems to require extra staff (which might happen eventually but not at first). Live support chat is new to career sites, but becoming common on retail commerce sites and fast becoming an expected support channel. You can choose to use it lightly, where it only pops up for key jobs or categories, or assertively, where every career site visitor receives the opportunity to chat.

Live chat is a fantastic way to engage and hopefully capture the visitor. If you're interested, check out products like PHP Live ($9/month).

These are relatively simple to implement, as I promised, but they can have a big effect on building a candidate community. I know they got the Texans excited last week. It's too costly NOT to add some of these features to your job site. Choose at least one, and let me know how it goes!

Good luck-

Peter Brasket
HotGigs Inc.

Subscribe

  • Get regular updates via email or RSS feed.

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

AddThis Social Bookmark Button